Appeals court affirms judge who refunded part of deposit | Hudson Star Observer
Sections

Weather Forecast

Close
Advertisement

Appeals court affirms judge who refunded part of deposit

Email News Alerts

In a March 3 decision, the appeals court found a bank isn't entitled to the deposit paid by a man who decided a foreclosure property wasn't worth what he bid.

Advertisement

Chase Home Finance argued that it was entitled to the full $26,500 deposit paid by Richard Nels Pearson when he bid on property at 506 Cherry Lane, Roberts.

Get the full story
Subscribe or Log In

Advertisement
Advertisement